Key Takeaways
- Graphy is built for individual creators and coaches selling digital products. It prioritises brand launch and audience monetisation, not training operations.
- Classplus is built for coaching institutes wanting a branded mobile app. Its strength is rapid digital entry for small-to-mid coaching centres.
- Neither platform natively supports multi-batch delivery, sub-organisations, SCORM compliance, or deep learner analytics, the very operational requirements that define a training business.
- Graphy charges a revenue share on its entry plan, while Classplus has a credit-based billing system for live classes, making their cost of ownership much higher than their marketed pricing.
- Professional training businesses running multiple cohorts, instructors, and client programmes typically outgrow both platforms based on requirements and cost-efficiency.
- Edmingle is a training operations platform purpose-built for training businesses, with 0% transaction fees, native multi-batch, SCORM support, and AI-powered analytics.
When a training business starts shopping for an LMS platform, two names come up often: Graphy and Classplus. Both are India-built. They let you sell courses with a branded mobile app. Since both are also heavily marketed, it is quite natural to compare them.
But here is what the comparison pages do not tell you: Graphy and Classplus were designed for different buyers altogether. Graphy was built for creators and coaches building an audience from scratch. While Classplus works best for individual tutors and small coaching centres that want to go digital fast. Neither was designed for a training business managing multiple cohorts and instructors, B2B client delivery, SCORM compliance, or the operational depth that serious programme delivery requires.
This article gives you an honest side-by-side measure of Graphy and Classplus across dimensions that matter: pricing transparency, range of functionality, analytics, mobile apps, support quality, and platform direction. But our goal is to help you find the right platform for your business and not just pick between two options that might not work for you. We also cover what Edmingle, a training operations platform built precisely for your requirements, does differently.
What Is Graphy?
Graphy is an online course and creator platform. Its core promise is speed: a creator or coach can form a published course and a working payment checkout in hours. It is essentially designed for solopreneurs, influencers, fitness coaches, financial educators, and content brands who want to monetise their expertise without building tech infrastructure.
| Attribute | Details |
| Founded / Parent | Spayee (2012), acquired by Graphy/Unacademy in 2021 |
| Most similar to | Kajabi, Teachable, Thinkific |
| Typical users | Individual creators, coaches, influencers, financial educators, yoga/fitness instructors, language teachers |
| Pricing (INR) | Launch ₹24,999/year, Grow ₹49,999/year, Rise ₹99,999/mo |
| Transaction fees | 10% on Launch, 7.5% on Grow, 5% on Rise |
| Mobile apps | Included from Rise plan only |
| Avg. rating | G2: 4.3/5 Capterra: 4.7/5Trustpilot: 4.1/5 |
Graphy Key Features
- Self-paced course builder with video, PDF, and audio formats
- Live class delivery via Zoom and YouTube Live integration
- Branded website builder with AI-assisted setup
- Membership and digital product sales (ebooks, templates, bundles)
- AI Brain, AI Agents (sales, support, marketing), and AI Avatars for in-course tutoring
- Community features for learner engagement
- Marketing automation, including email sequences and affiliate tools
- Basic quiz and assessment builder (5 question types)
- FairPlay + Widevine + PlayReady DRM for video protection
Graphy’s strongest selling point today is its AI stack. The AI Brain trains on the creator’s content and powers both the AI Agents (which handle visitor queries, sales outreach, and marketing responses) and AI Avatars (which function as in-course tutor clones). For a creator whose primary challenge is converting visitors and answering repetitive learner questions, this is genuinely useful.
| Must ReadEvaluating options beyond Graphy? Our 7 Best Graphy Alternatives for Training Businesses (2026) cover the full competitive landscape with side-by-sides, pricing, and buyer fit analysis. |
What Is Classplus?
Classplus launched in 2018 as an accessible coaching-app builder in India. Its founders designed it around a clear insight: millions of Indian tutors and coaching centre owners wanted to digitise their teaching but lacked both the technical skills and the capital to build their own app. Classplus solved that. Its ‘Aapki Coaching Aapki App’ positioning has been a success in the edtech industry.
| Attribute | Detail |
| Founded | 2018, by Mukul Rustagi and Bhaswat Agarwal. |
| Most similar to | Graphy, Learnyst |
| Typical users | Individual tutors, small-to-mid coaching centres, competitive exam prep teachers |
| Pricing | Annual subscription model. Pricing not fully published — requires sales call at higher tiers. |
| Transaction fees | Not publicly disclosed. Credit system for live classes reported by users. |
| Mobile apps | Branded apps included at higher tiers. Published under Classplus’s developer account, not the educator’s. |
| Free plan | Classplus Lite, a free plan for tutors with a small student base |
| Avg. rating | G2: 4/5Trustpilot: 2.9/5Techjockey: 4.3/5 |
Classplus Key Features
- Branded Android and iOS app for the educator’s coaching centre
- Live class delivery
- Content management for recorded video, PDFs, notes, and study material
- Student and batch management for individual coaching centres
- Fee collection and payment gateway with basic invoicing
- Marketing tools including referral programmes and notification broadcasts
- Parent portal for communication (useful for K-12 adjacent coaching)
- Classplus Lite (free plan) for tutors just getting started
Classplus’s actual competitive advantage is distribution and brand recognition in Tier 2 and Tier 3 India. The free Classplus Lite funnel has seeded the platform across hundreds of thousands of small coaching centres. For an educator taking their first digital step, the product works wonderfully.
| Must ReadEvaluating options other than Classplus? Make use of our 7 Best Classplus Alternatives (2026) guide to understand hidden pricing, tiered features, and scaling potential you might miss otherwise. |
Graphy vs Classplus: The Main Differences
On the surface, Graphy and Classplus appear to be competing for the same buyer. They are not. Each was built for a distinct use case, and the differences become clearer as your training operation grows.
| Dimension | Graphy | Classplus |
| Primary design intent | Creator/coach monetisation to sell expertise online | Coaching-app builder to digitise an existing offline coaching centre |
| Who is it built for | Solopreneurs, influencers, coaches, content brands | Individual tutors, small-to-mid coaching institutes |
| Multi-batch delivery | Not a core construct | Limited, basic batch grouping only |
| Sub-organisations / B2B | Not available | Not available |
| SCORM compliance | Not documented | Not documented |
| Marketing automation | Email sequences, AI Agents | Referrals, notification broadcasts |
| Learner analytics depth | Limited, like active users, granular reports, downloads, time spent | Basic, like student counts, attendance |
| AI features | AI Brain, AI Agents, AI Avatars (creator-facing) | AI-enabled marketing tools; no AI analytics engine |
| Proctoring | Not available | Not available |
| Branded mobile app | Rise plan only (₹99,999/year) | Included in higher-tier plans |
| App ownership | User’s own developer account | Published under Classplus’s account |
| Transaction fees | 10% (Launch), 7.5% (Grow), 5% (Rise) | Not disclosed publicly |
| GST invoicing | No, generic tax invoicing | Yes |
| UPI payments | Limited | Yes, INR-native |
| Company direction | Backed by Unacademy; focused as a creator platform | Diversifying into B2C and edtech finance |
Graphy vs Classplus: Main Similarities
Despite different origin stories, Graphy and Classplus share several characteristics that make them feel interchangeable in an initial evaluation.
- They are India-built platforms with INR pricing and India-native payment options.
- They support video course delivery, live classes, and basic assessment tools.
- They offer branded mobile apps, though on different plan tiers.
- Both provide no-code website builders for creating a course storefront.
- Both target the educator-to-entrepreneur buyer who wants to package their knowledge.
- The two platforms have community features for learner engagement.
The surface similarity is what makes the comparison feel legitimate. But these shared features cover the creator use case, not the training operations use case. Once your business crosses certain thresholds, like multiple concurrent batches, a second instructor, corporate clients, or any B2B delivery, the similarities become less important than the gaps.
Graphy vs Classplus Head-to-Head: Feature Comparison
Let’s move forward from similarities to the differences between the tools. We will take each aspect important for training businesses and pit the tools against each other, starting with their pricing.
Pricing and True Cost of Ownership
Headline pricing comparisons are misleading for both platforms. The number on the pricing page is not what you will actually pay.
| Graphy | Classplus | |
| Entry plan | ₹24,999/year(plus 10% transaction fee per sale or ₹10, whichever is higher) | ₹19,999/year |
| Mid plan | ₹49,999/year(plus 7.5% transaction fee per sale or ₹10, whichever is higher) | Up to ₹50,000/year |
| 0% fees plan | Configurable only in custom plans | Not confirmed publicly |
| Hidden costs | Apple Developer fee ($99/yr) charged to user; AI training metered after 50 hrs; onboarding fees non-refundable | While not publicly disclosed, users document a Live class credit system, and extra charges for zero-lag live classes |
| Refund policy | 7-day window documented; but only for flat subscription fee | No |
| Billing model | Annual | Annual |
The real starting price for a Graphy plan that includes a branded mobile app and minimal transaction fees is the Rise plan at ₹99,999/ year. At that point, the headline advantage over a proper LMS disappears entirely.
Also, a training business doing ₹30 lakhs every year in course revenue on this plan pays almost ₹1.5 lakhs in transaction fees, more than most LMS subscriptions. Multiple verified reviewers on Trustpilot and G2 point this out as a frustrating pricing decision.
Course Delivery and Content Management
Both platforms handle the basics of course delivery. The differences emerge around multi-instructor environments and content compliance requirements.
| Feature | Graphy | Classplus |
| Video / PDF / audio | Yes | Yes |
| SCORM compliance | Not documented | Not documented |
| Live classes | Zoom + YouTube Live | Yes, built-in |
| Multi-batch scheduling | Not a native construct | Limited batch grouping |
| Drip content | Yes | Yes |
| Assessments | Quiz builder, 5 question types | Basic quiz functionality |
| DRM | FairPlay + Widevine + PlayReady | Basic content production |
| Coding assessments | Not available | Not available |
| Proctoring | Not available | Not available |
Operations and Business Management
This is where both platforms show their architectural limits. Neither was designed for the training business and its daily functionality that runs structured cohort-based programmes at scale.
| Feature | Graphy | Classplus |
| Multi-batch management | Not natively supported | Basic batch grouping |
| Sub-organisations / tenants | Not available | Not available |
| Multi-instructor control | Supported, but with plan limitations | Basic |
| Role-based access | Granular | Basic |
| Fee / payment templates | Standard checkout | Standard checkout |
| Bulk enrolment operations | Limited | Limited |
| B2B / corporate client delivery | Not supported | Not supported |
| Learner sign-in tracking | Basic | Basic |
| GST invoicing | Not India-specific | Basic |
| UPI / Indian payments | Limited | Yes – INR-native |
Analytics and Reporting
Analytics is what makes up the gap between creator platforms and training operations platforms. Graphy and Classplus both offer dashboards. But neither offers the learner-level engagement intelligence that a training business needs to optimise retention, demonstrate outcomes to clients, or make instructional decisions.
| Feature | Graphy | Classplus |
| Learner-level engagement data | Active users, time spent, downloads, granular reports | Attendance and basic activity counts |
| Engagement health scoring | Not available | Not available |
| Cohort / batch-level analytics | Not available | Basic |
| Course performance analytics | Basic | Basic |
| Trainer analytics | Not available | Not available |
| Marketing funnel analytics | Lead tracking, conversion, and traffic dashboard | Basic |
| AI-powered insights | AI features are visitor/creator facing, not analytics-focused | Not available |
| Exportable reports | Limited | Limited |
AI Features
AI is the most marketed differentiator for Graphy in 2026. Understanding what the AI actually does and who it serves matters when you are evaluating it.
| Feature | Graphy | Classplus |
| Learner analytics | Not available, AI is creator/sales facing | Not available |
| Sales automation | AI Agents handle visitor queries, sales outreach, and follow-ups | Requires third-party tools |
| In-course tutoring | AI Avatars trained on creator’s content | Not available |
| Content creation | AI website builder, AI course structure suggestions | Not natively available |
| Feedback analysis | Not available | Not available |
| Assessment evaluator | Not available | Not available |
| Learning companion / AI tutor | AI Avatar (single-layer, creator content only with no persistent memory) | Not available |
Graphy’s AI is real and useful, but for the creators. It converts visitors, answers student queries automatically, and creates an interactive tutor-clone experience. None of this actually addresses the training operator’s need, like understanding why learners disengage, which trainers are effective, and which cohorts are at risk of low completion.
Support and Customer Experience
No feature comparison is honest without addressing support. Because when the platform breaks, or a feature does not work the way it was sold, support is what you actually paid for.
| Feature | Graphy | Classplus |
| Trustpilot rating | 4.1/5 (360+ reviews) | 2.9/5 (2+ reviews) |
| G2 rating | 4.3/5 (160+ reviews) | Unrated yet |
| Consistent across reviews | Aggressive pre-sale, unresponsive post-sale; Multiple refund denials within the 7-day window; Onboarding tickets unanswered for weeks. | Post-payment support collapses; Credit system charges not disclosed upfront; Features promised at sale not delivered; Apps published under Classplus’s account. |
| Support channels | Chat, email, help desk | Chat, email, help desk |
| Dedicated CSM | Not standard | Not standard |
| NoteVerified SoftwareSuggest and Techjockey reviews for Classplus consistently flag limited customisation, no advanced analytics, and post-sale support as the three primary weaknesses. |
Where Graphy Wins
Being fair here matters to us. Graphy is genuinely the right choice for specific buyers:
- Solo creators and coaches who want to take advantage of Graphy’s quick time-to-launch
- Educators building audience-first businesses (newsletters, communities, digital products alongside courses) with Graphy’s monetisation stack
- Businesses that want aggressive AI-driven visitor conversion
- DRM-heavy content businesses
- Influencers leveraging brand recognition since being associated with Unacademy carry weight with a creator-economy audience
Where Classplus Wins
Those who can make perfect use of Classplus are:
- Individual tutors and small coaching centres
- Tier 2 and Tier 3 coaching institutes that primarily need a branded app for their existing student base
- Educators who serve K-12 adjacent markets where parent communication and parent portals are relevant
- Businesses with simple use cases that do not require analytics, automation, or compliance, and for whom the app itself is the primary deliverable
What Neither Platform Is Built for: The Training Operations Gap
Here is the honest reality. A training business is not a creator business, and it is not a coaching-app business. A training business has structural requirements that neither Graphy nor Classplus was architected to handle.
If your business involves any of the following, you will hit the architectural ceiling of both platforms within months:
- Multi-instructor environments with role-based access, trainer-specific analytics, and restricted visibility
- Proctored assessments for certification programmes (Mettl or Examonline integration)
- Multiple concurrent batches of the same programme
- B2B or corporate client delivery where you need separate sub-organisations, white-labelled environments, or SCORM-compliant content export
- Analytics that can chart learner progress and course disengagement
- Marketing automation tied to learner behaviour
This is not a criticism of Graphy or Classplus. The issue here is that when a training business compares these two, it can walk away thinking the choice is between creator platform A and creator platform B, when what you actually need is a different category of product.
Why Established Training Businesses Choose Edmingle Instead
Edmingle is not a creator platform. It is a training operations platform built for work that Graphy and Classplus are not suitable for: established training and skilling businesses running structured cohort-based programmes with multiple instructors, multiple clients, and complex delivery requirements. Let’s take a look at the features that make it an apt choice in lieu of the other two tools.
| Feature | Graphy | Classplus | Edmingle |
| Multi-batch system | ❌ | Partial | ✅ Native – per-batch scheduling, reporting, community |
| Sub-organisations (B2B / franchise) | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ Native – white-labelled per sub-org |
| SCORM compliance | Not documented | Not documented | ✅ From ₹14,999/mo (Prime plan) |
| Proctoring (Mettl / Examonline) | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ Power+ plans |
| Learner analytics depth | Basic (views, time spent) | Basic (attendance, counts) | ✅ Engagement health scoring, activity heatmaps, cohort curves, AI insights |
| Marketing automation | Email sequences, AI Agents | Notifications, referrals | ✅ Behaviour-triggered workflows, dynamic segmentation |
| AI features | AI Avatar, AI Agents (creator-facing) | Basic AI marketing | ✅ Veda AI (AI Companion, AI Assessment Evaluator, AI Content Generation), AI Automations |
| Transaction fees | 10% (Launch), 7.5% (Grow), 5% (Rise) | Not disclosed | ✅ 0% – unconditional, all plans |
| Branded mobile app | Rise plan only (₹99,999/year) | Included in higher tiers | ✅ Android from Prime (₹14,999/mo); iOS from Power (₹29,999/mo) |
| App in own store account | Yes | ❌ (Classplus account) | ✅ Own App Store account |
| GST invoicing | No | Basic | ✅ Native |
| UPI payments | Limited | Yes | ✅ Native |
| Coding assessments | Basic (In-built) | ❌ | ✅ Built-in with submission limits |
| Dedicated CSM | No | No | ✅Yes |
| Pricing (INR) | ₹24,999 – ₹99,999/year (plus fees) | ₹19,999+/year (with undisclosed charges) | ₹7,499 – ₹29,999/mo (0% hidden cost) |
| 15-day money-back | 7 days | Not confirmed | ✅ 15-day guarantee |
Edmingle Pricing
The lack of hidden pricing and transaction costs keeps Edmingle pricing predictable and affordable. Here’s a breakdown of its plans for your budgeting needs.
| Plan | Price/mo | Monthly Active Learners | Storage | Key Inclusions |
| Core | ₹7,499 | 500 | 100 GB | Core LMS, website builder, basic analytics |
| Prime | ₹14,999 | 1,000 | 250 GB | SCORM, Branded Android app, all APIs, AI feedback analysis, call support, onboarding |
| Power | ₹29,999 | 2,000 | 500 GB | Branded Android + iOS, sub-organisations, AI learner analytics, Mettl proctoring, priority SLA |
| Maxx | On request | Custom | Custom | Full white-label apps in own store accounts, dedicated CSM, custom SLA |
| Must ReadSee how Edmingle compares specifically against other platforms you might be evaluating, like Learnyst and Thinkific, in the Edmingle vs Learnyst and Edmingle vs Thinkific pages.For a complete picture of the edtech solutions, check out LMS Pricing Comparison for India (2026) with full side-by-sides across Classplus, Learnyst, LearnWorlds, and Edmingle. |
Migrating from Graphy or Classplus to Edmingle
The migration question is the most practical one for businesses already on either platform. Here is what the process typically looks like.
From Graphy
- Course content can be exported and re-uploaded. Drip schedules and content structures need to be manually reconstructed.
- Student lists can be exported as CSVs. Edmingle’s bulk enrolment tools handle re-onboarding at scale.
- Graphy’s AI Brain content training does not transfer since it is specific to Graphy’s AI infrastructure.
- Typical migration timeline: 2–4 weeks depending on course volume and configuration complexity.
From Classplus
- Recorded video content is accessible for download and re-upload to Edmingle’s content library.
- Student data (name, phone, email) can typically be exported and imported via Edmingle’s bulk tools.
- Edmingle creates a new branded app in the educator’s own developer account to support branded app migration
- Batch structures can be recreated in Edmingle with the added benefit of proper multi-batch management and per-batch analytics.
- A typical migration timeline can take 2–4 weeks depending on the scale of the business. Fee collection history requires manual documentation if regulatory records are needed.
| NoteEdmingle’s migration support is available from the Power plan onwards. Businesses moving from Classplus often report that the most valuable part of the process is the training and workflow redesign, not just the data transfer. Reach out to Edmingle’s onboarding team to discuss your specific migration scenario. |
Graphy vs Classplus: Bottom Line
Graphy and Classplus are both legitimate platforms. They serve their intended buyers well. The problem is that their intended buyers are not training businesses, but individual educators, creators, and small coaching institutes at the start of their digital journey.
If your operation is genuinely small and simple, like one instructor, one programme, or a few hundred students, either platform can work. Graphy for a creator-first audience-building approach; Classplus for a coaching-centre-first branded-app approach.
But if you are running multiple cohorts, serve corporate clients, or need analytics that tell you something actionable about learner behaviour, the right answer is to step outside this comparison entirely. Edmingle was built for exactly that transition.
| Best for | Platform | Why |
| Individual creators and coaches | Graphy | Best AI, fastest launch, creator-economy monetisation |
| Small coaching centres | Classplus | India-native app, low entry price, Tier 2/3 familiarity |
| Professional training businesses | Edmingle | Multi-batch, sub-orgs, SCORM, 0% fees, AI-powered analytics |
| Corporate / B2B training delivery | Edmingle | Sub-organisations, SCORM, proctoring, enterprise SLA |
| High-revenue training | Edmingle | 0% transaction fees even with scaling |
| Ready to See What a Training Operations Platform Looks Like?Edmingle is purpose-built for training businesses that have outgrown creator tools and coaching apps. 0% transaction fees, multi-batch, SCORM, AI-powered analytics, and dedicated support from ₹7,499/mo.Start Your Free Trial on Edmingle |
